Table of Contents

Share this post

Microservices vs Monoliths: Making the Right Choice in 2025
Architectureยทยท5 min readยท15,243 views

Microservices vs Monoliths: Making the Right Choice in 2025

An honest comparison of microservices and monolithic architectures based on real-world experience.

Microservices vs Monoliths: Making the Right Choice in 2025

The microservices vs monolith debate has raged for years. After building systems both ways, here's what actually matters.

The Monolith Case

A well-built monolith can scale further than you think:

  • Simple deployment: One artifact, one process
  • Easy debugging: Stack traces don't cross network boundaries
  • Consistent transactions: ACID guarantees within a single database
  • Fast development: No network overhead between components

When Monoliths Work

  • Small to medium teams (< 50 developers)
  • Predictable traffic patterns
  • Tight coupling between features
  • Early-stage products

The Microservices Case

Microservices shine when:

  • Independent scaling: Different services have different load patterns
  • Team autonomy: Teams can deploy independently
  • Technology diversity: Use the right tool for each job
  • Fault isolation: One service failing doesn't bring down everything

When Microservices Work

  • Large organizations (> 50 developers)
  • Clear service boundaries
  • Need for independent deployment
  • Different scaling requirements per service

The Middle Ground: Modular Monoliths

Before jumping to microservices, consider a modular monolith:

monolith/
โ”œโ”€โ”€ modules/
โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ users/
โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ billing/
โ”‚   โ””โ”€โ”€ analytics/
โ””โ”€โ”€ shared/

Benefits:

  • Enforced boundaries like microservices
  • Deployment simplicity like monoliths
  • Easy to split into microservices later

Migration Strategy

If you must migrate from monolith to microservices:

  1. Identify boundaries: Look for natural seams in your domain
  2. Extract gradually: One service at a time
  3. Maintain data consistency: Use eventual consistency patterns
  4. Monitor everything: Distributed systems are complex
# Don't do this
monolith.split_everything()

# Do this
new_service = extract_bounded_context("billing")
proxy_requests(monolith, new_service)
validate_behavior()

The Hidden Costs

Microservices bring operational complexity:

  • Service discovery: How do services find each other?
  • Distributed tracing: Following requests across services
  • Data consistency: No more simple transactions
  • Testing: Integration tests become expensive
  • Debugging: Network issues, timeouts, partial failures

Decision Framework

Choose monolith if:

  • Starting a new project
  • Team size < 20
  • Unclear domain boundaries
  • Need rapid iteration

Choose microservices if:

  • Clear domain boundaries exist
  • Multiple teams working independently
  • Different scaling requirements
  • Already have operational maturity

Conclusion

Start with a monolith. Extract microservices when:

  • You have clear evidence you need them
  • You have the operational capacity to run them
  • The benefits outweigh the complexity

Most companies overestimate the benefits and underestimate the costs of microservices. Don't cargo cult architecture decisions made by companies with different constraints.

Build what solves your problems, not what's trendy.

Comments (0)

Loading comments...